v0215-699

ISo. 897.

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

NINTH CIRCUIT

1. 1. PEACOCK & CO., Limited, et al.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

VS.

FILE

1. 1. PRATT, Assessor and Collector, Divis-^ ^OV 11 II

ion of Honolulu, Hawaiian Territory,

Defendant in Error.

Reply Brief for Plaintiffs in Error.

THOMAS FITCH and J. J. DUNNE,

Counsel for Plaintiffs in Error.

The Mardock Pts, 533 3ay St, S, F.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0215

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0215

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0215#page/n698/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

decision, protest, taxes, payment, bill, below, authority, remedy, questions, principles, id, pro, precedent, paid, hawaiian

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

thomas fitch, stare decisis, unsound basis, tacitly assented, su preme, solitary mississippi, single precedent, settled doctrine, respectfully submitted, regarded compare, pro nounced, openly followed, isolated decision, fol lowed, erroneous application

Document Status: UGLY