v0221-139

IS THE COMPLAINANT'S EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGE

OF INCINERATING HOUSE REFUSE AND GAR-

BAGE IN SAN FRANCISCO VALID?

No. 901.

IN THE

MxxxUh BUU^ Oltrrmt (fluurt of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

CALirORMIA REDUCTION COMPANY, ct. al,

Appellants,

vs.

SANITARY REDUCTtON WORKS OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Appellee.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS.

PAGE, MCCUTCHEN & KNIGHT, and

GARRET W. MCENERNEY,

Counsel for Appellants.

TMK. MTAK PRlilSS JAMUS H. MAKHV

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0221

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0221

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0221#page/n138/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

franchise, city, grant, power, privilege, complainant, public, san, right, francisco, section, refuse, police, garbage, claimed

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

san francisco, house refuse, privilege claimed, police power, march 23, dead animals, san francisco., 23 1893, cubic yard, 1893 stats., refuse butchers, public health, police power., police powers, sub stances

Document Status: UGLY