v0324-433
IN THE
lilESlllfilflffl
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
WM. L. TULL, DORA MAY SEELEY
and ERNEST B. TULL,
Appellants.
vs ' ) No W
LUCIUS B. NASH and LUCIUS G/
NASH, co-partners as Nash & Nash,
Appellees.
f}ry
On Appeal from the United States Circuit Court for the Dis-
trict of Washington, Eastern Division.
PETITION FOR REHEARING.
FREDERICK W. DEWART,
Solicitor,
SPOKANE, WASH.
7Nf (MLUni MiMTlNttt. PllttUM
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0324
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0324
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0324#page/n432/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
nash, tull, seeley, dora, contract, lucius, dormitzer, matters, denied, william, rehearing, petition, paper, main, solicitor
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
nash nash, tull dora, dewart solicitor, washington eastern, testify regarding, spokane wash., solicitor spokane, nash refused, unul ullut, ullut ui, uberrina fides, uberrima fides., tull though, tull nash, tull believed
Document Status: UGLY