v0347-229
No. 1260
IN THE
Winittt) gtateg
Ctrtuit Court of Appeals
For the Ninth Circuit.
The Aetna Indemnity Company
(a corporation),
Plaintiff in Error,
VS.
Auto-Traction Company of San Jose
(a corporation),
Defendant in Error.
PETITION BY PLAINTIFF IN ERROR FOR
REHEARING.
JUDSON C. Brusie and
Aylett R. Cotton,
Attorneys for Aetna Indemnity
Company, Petitioner.
Filed this day of July, A. D. 1906.
FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.
By Deputy Clerk.
n LEI
JUL '2iy06
PKE.SS OF THE JAMKS H. BAKKY CO.
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0347
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0347
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0347#page/n228/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
rescinded, money, breach, rescission, respectfully, paid, special, pleaded, indemnity, damages, aetna, submitted, recover, pleading, contract
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
money paid, respectfully submitted, aetna indemnity, rescinded agree, san jose, respectfully prays, rescinded contract, consideration money, auto traction, winittt gtateg, wholly inconsistent, versal automobile, uni versal, tomobiles contracted, thereby extinguished
Document Status: UGLY