v0350-105

No. 1282

IN THE

ImtrJi BtuUB (Extaxxt dnurt af Appmh

FOR the: ninth circuit

ISAAC U MARKS,

Appellant,

VS.

WILLIAM C GATES and

HOWARD TURNER,

Appellees.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

MILLER, WEST & DE JOURNEL,

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant.

CAMPBELL, METSON & CAMPBELL, and

DEASNER & STETSON,

Of Counsel.

The James H. Barry Co.

FEB 2

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0350

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0350

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0350#page/n104/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, equity, gates, consideration, performance, right, specific, property, contracts, pomeroy, trans, interest, creek, below, relief

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

specific performance, equity jurisprudence, cleary creek, valuable consideration, placer mining, right limit, fifth interest, below discovery, jurisprudence sees., location purchase, grub stake, creek placer, appel lant, ap pellant, sufficiently definite

Document Status: UGLY