v0410-647

^'mm.^.^'^:

No. 1399

.*-

^

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit.

JOSEPH FORDERER,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

CHAS. B. PHILLIPS, WALTER SCHMIDT,

ALBERT FINK, GORDON HALL, FRANK

1. SHAW and the WILD GOOSE MINING

& TRADING COMPANY (a corporation).

Defendants in Error.

REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANT IN ERROR WILD

GOOSE MINING & TRADING COMPANY.

Chas. Page,

EdWD. J. McCuTCHEN,

1. 1. Burnett,

Attorneys for Defendant in Error Wild Goose

Mining S Trading Company.

Filed this.

dayf of February, A. D. 1907.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By Deputy Clerk.

Pebnatj Publishing Co,

FILED

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0410

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0410

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0410#page/n646/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

work, tenant, assessment, delinquent, share, schmidt, interest, right, mining, forfeiture, 1901, claims, working, 1902, statute

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

assessment work, wild goose, goose mining, gold dust, bull domingo, assessment work., non working, mining trading, mines 2nd, 2nd ed., sessment work, sequoia bench, january 1902, walter schmidt, vested right

Document Status: UGLY