v0544-779

No. 1710

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circait

WILLIAM E. KELLEY and ALLAN H.

DAUGHARTY, as copartners, doing

business under the firm name and style

of W. E. KELLEY & COMPANY,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

1. 1. BENTON,

Defendant in Error.

ORAL ARGUMENT OF JOHN J. DAILEY, ESQ.,

FOR DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Filed this day of April, 1910.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By - -. - Deputy Clerk.

PEnNAU Publishing Co.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0544

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0544

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0544#page/n778/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

lumber, benton, findings, oral, contract, finding, variance, cal, delivered, 1905, settlement, grader, grade, ground, grading

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

lumber delivered, lum ber, white pine, oral argument, california sugar, stat ute, pine agency, executed oral, december 1905, dailey esq., contract provided, yere behind, written contract, woupert 134, wliat happened

Document Status: UGLY