v0631-359

No. 1888

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

RUSSO-CHINESE BANK

(a corporation),

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE

OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

(a corporation),

Defendant in Error.

Reply Brief for Plaintiff in Error.

1. 1. Stiles,

Chickering & Gregory,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error

Filed this..

day of October, 1910.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By Deputy Clerk.

PXBNA0 rUBLISBINO CO.

FILED

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0631

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0631

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0631#page/n358/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

draft, clarkson, bill, documents, drafts, bank, flour, bills, payment, maturity, contract, paid, right, steamship, port

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

port arthur, arthur branch, centennial mill, national bank, express contract, proposed bill, hyades draft, ginsburg draft, chinese bank, wise injured, stiles chickering, seattle washington, russo chinese, rec ord, promptly returned

Document Status: UGLY