v0668-589

No. 1977

IN THE

Intt^b i^tatefi Qltrrmt Qlnurt of App^ala

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIOCENE DITCH COMPANY,

Appellant,

vs.

CAMPION MINING a TRADING COMPANY,

Appellee.

Rejoinder of Miocene Ditch Company to

Reply of Wild Goose Mining Trading

Company on Motion to Quash.

1. 1. PILLSBURY and

HORATIO ALLING.

Attorneys for Miocene Ditch Company.

Filed this day of June, A. D. 1912.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By Deputy Clerk.

THE JAMES H. BARRY COMPANY

SAN FRANCISCO

FILE D

JUN4-191?

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0668

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0668

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0668#page/n588/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

fraud, term, relief, miocene, wild, goose, bill, extrinsic, ditch, review, attack, trading, mining, federal, reply

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

wild goose, miocene ditch, term attack, mining trading, intrinsic fraud, goose mining, extrinsic fraud, campion mining, trinsic fraud, oral argument., federal courts, courts prohibiting, 1977 campion, war rant, virtue alone

Document Status: UGLY