v0755-257

?

No. 2133

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

CALIFORNIA-ATLANTIC STEAMSHIP

COMPANY (a corporation),

Appellant,

vs.

CENTRAL DOOR & LUMBER COMPANY

(a corporation),

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF*

Jurisdiction is not Presumed on Appeal to Support the

Decree. On the Contrary, Absence of Jurisdiction is

Presumed.

Appellee argues at page 9 of his opening brief, as

follows :

"The decree having been taken pro confesso the

presumption is that all the facts necessaiy to war-

rant the decree have been properly found, IF they

are substantially averred in the libel."

*In this case appellant has filed three briefs, its original, a

supplemental (green) brief, and this reply to appellee's two briefs

"opening" and "reply".

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0755

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0755

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0755#page/n256/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, libel, contract, insurance, goods, default, maritime, carriage, land, damages, respondent, railroad, negligence, courts, steamship

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

procure insurance, california atlantic, atlantic steamship, pro confesso, maritime contract., connecting lines, wrong tribunal., water carriage, richard winsloiv, pacific coast, non maritime, negligence occurred, moss landing, marine insurance, land carriage

Document Status: UGLY