v0755-489

IN THE ia

llnitⁱ S'tafeB Oltrrutt Qlnurt nf App^alfi

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

1. 1. WILL JORGENSEN,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, a Mu-

nicipal Corporation of the State of

California,

Defendant in Error.

No. 2I2I

PETITION FOR A REHEARING.

To the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the

Ninth Circuit, and to the Justices of said Court:

The plaintiff in error respectfully asks for a re-

hearing of this cause by this Court:

In the opinion on file herein it is held that the

work in suit was extra and beyond the terms and

requirements of the contract. But it is further held

that section 4073 of the Political Code of this State

covers this case; that the board of supervisors would

not become liable to pay for said work except in the

manner prescribed in that section; and that said statute

is preclusive of the county's liability in the present

case.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0755

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0755

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0755#page/n488/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

section, contract, work, plans, code, 4073, change, bridge, construction, changes, contractor, extra, county, alterations, specifications

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

section 4073, extra work, section 4072, political code, section 4041, thirds vote, distinct work, code ., lowest bidder, entirely outside, 4041 pol., specifica tions, public improvement, political code., competitive bidding

Document Status: UGLY