v0760-469

Document Title Page

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES L. INTERMELA and the

AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY, a

corporation, of the State of New York,

Plaintiffs in Error, ^ No.

vs.

DAVID PERKINS,

Defendant in Error.

Petition for Re-hearing

Now comes the plaintiffs in error by their attor-

ney and counsel, U. D. Gnagey, and deeming them-

selves aggrieved by the judgment of this court affirm-

ing the judgment of the district court entered Feb-

ruary 15, 1912, petitions for a re-hearing and a re-

versal of said judgment.

    1. Gnagey,

Attorney for Plaintiffs in Error.

I hereby certify that, in my judgment, the fore-

going petition is well founded in law and is not in-

terposed for delay.

    1. Gnagey,

Attorney for Plaintiffs in Error.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0760

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0760

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0760#page/n468/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

city, warrant, meeting, fund, decision, void, council, treasurer, indebtedness, regular, warrants, finding, findings, supreme, session

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

city council, indebtedness fund, regular meeting, port townsend, san jose, indebtedness fund., adjourned meeting, tax rolls, tax payers, street grade, really belonged, fifth finding, debt limit, county realty, special meeting.,

Document Status: UGLY