v0772-203

1^

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OREGON AND CALIFORNIA RAIL-

ROAD COMPANY, a Corporation,

Complainant and Appellant,

vs.

MARIA DE GRUBISSICH, nee MARIA de

POURTALES,

Defendant and Appellee.

No.

2181

SUPPLEMENTAL AND REPLY BRIEF FOR

COMPLAINANT AND APPELLANT.

In view of the technical objections urged by

counsel for defendant and appellee, (pages 1-10,

Brief of Appellee) that the Assignments of Error

(Transcript, pp. 1678-1679-1681) do not state

separately and particularly each error asserted and

intended to be urged, and that the specifications of

errors relied upon do not state ''as particularly as

may be in what the decree is alleged to be erro-

neous," we deem it advisable, in addition to the

statement of issues (pages 16, 17, 18, 19, Brief for

Appellant), and the statement of points and author-

ities (pages 20 to 36, Brief for Appellant) to repeat

for the convenience of the court and counsel, the

Assignments of Error, as follows :

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0772

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0772

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0772#page/n202/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

oregon, ben, railroad, holladay, central, march, 1870, complainant, california, stock, property, premises, minutes, minute, pany

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

ben holladay, oregon central, central railroad, california railroad, oregon california, holding adjudging, rail road, minute book, minute books, written proposition, central rail, ben holla, temple emmet, oregon laws, 2nd ed.,

Document Status: UGLY