v0773-431

^

No. 2182

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

EUSSO-CHINESE BANK (a corporation),

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE

OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON,

Defendant in Error.

PETITION FOR REHEARING.

To the EonoraUe William B. Gilbert, Presiding

Judge, and the Associate Judges of the United

States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit:

Plaintiff in error respectfully requests a re-

hearing in this case.

This court, in its opinion affirming the judgment,

has discussed but a single phase of the case. It has

concluded "that the special verdict of the jury

finding that the Port Arthur branch of the Russo-

Chinese Bank did receive payment of the draft

dated December 11, 1903" is conclusive, and that

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0773

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0773

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0773#page/n430/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

bank, flour, draft, clarkson, port, arthur, paid, 1904, chinese, payment, instructions, custom, short, russo, drafts

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

port arthur, chinese bank, russo chinese, arthur branch, clark son, seattle bank, national bank, arthur bank, hyades flour, permitted clarkson, february 1904, eusso chinese, centennial mill, 928 roubles, 126 928,

Document Status: UGLY