v0802-601

3n % Imtpb BUUb dtrrmt ^^

Olourt of Appeals for tl?

Nmtl Qltrruit

JAMES G. KID WELL, ^

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

OREGON SHORT LINE RAIL- }

ROAD COMPANY, a corpora

tion,

Defendant in Error. .

No. 2247

pptttton for IJeIpartttg nf Plaintiff in Srrnr

Now comes the plaintiff in error herein and re-

spectfully presents this his petition for rehearing.

In presenting this petition for rehearing we do

so upon the ground that we believe that this action

was decided both in the court below and in this court

upon a ground that was unnecessary for either court

to consider at all because the point herein advanced

and argued in our opening brief obviates the neces-

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0802

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0802

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0802#page/n600/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

cattle, omaha, minnedoka, bill, lading, falls, american, destination, stock, transcript, huntington, carrier, contract, billed, allegation

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

american falls, initial carrier, union pacific, shipping contract, plead ings, fourth allegation, december 5th, un loading, tween huntington, trans portation, tl nmtl, tiff paid, thereafter designate, ters pointed, suggests itself

Document Status: UGLY