v0811-625

No. 2262

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

MISSION TEANSPORTATION AND

REFINING COMPANY (a corpora-

tion), claimant of the Barkentine

''Fullerton", etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY

(a corporation),

Appellee.

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT AND

CROSS=APPELLEE.

The faults charged by appellee and cross-appellant

in its reply brief against the ''Fullerton" are three,

viz.:

Improper anchorage, insufficient night watch, and

failure to ring the required fog bell.

THE ANCHORAGE OF THE "FULLERTON".

It is contended that the "Fullerton" was improperly

anchored in that she was within the "fairway" of the

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0811

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0811

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0811#page/n624/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

fullerton, transit, slip, anchored, bell, proctor, fairway, forbidden, speed, tide, fog, collision, anchorage, zone, fault

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

forbidden zone, forbidden anchorage, ebb tide, san francisco, harbor commissioners, flood tide, transit ., slip bell, improperly anchored, fullerton ., ful lerton, forbidden zone., ferry slip, estab lished, 16th street

Document Status: UGLY