v0821-697
TUnxUb States
(Etratti (fltmvt at KppmU
3far % Nutty (Htrrmt
PACIFIC COAST COAL COMPANY,
Plaintiff in Error,
vs.
STANLEY BROWN,
Defendant in Error.
REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
ASSUMPTION OF RISK.
Plaintiff's answer to defendant's charge that
Brown assumed the risk of Rigghi's act and of the
existing conditions can be plainly stated as follows:
Brown suspected that the place was dangerous be-
cause of gas and told the shot lighter of his fears.
The shot lighter assured him it was safe and Brown
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0821
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0821
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0821#page/n696/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
gas, statute, brown, safety, duty, right, servant, inspection, rigghi, master, work, risk, lamp, danger, negligence
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
safety lamp, shot lighter, safety lamp., northwestern imp., iron steel, fellow servant, expressly requires, experienced miner, vice principal, tony thomasino, steel works, statutory requirements, statutory duty, statute expressly, pacific coast
Document Status: UGLY