v0821-717

IVo. 2275.

Imfrft States (Etrrmt (Eourt

of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PACIFIC COAST COAL COM-

PANY, Plaintiff in Error,

VS.

STANLEY BROWN,

Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN DISTRICT OF

WASHINGTON, NORTHERN DIVISION.

Hon. C. H. Hanford, C. W. Howard and Hon. E. E.

Cushman, Judges.

Petition of Defendant in Error for Rehearing

To the Honorable Circuit Judges :

Comes now defendant in error and respectfully

petitions for a rehearing, upon the ground that the

Court has been mislead by the brief of plaintiff in

error as to the statutory law of Washington at the

time of the decision in the case of Costa vs. Pacific

Coast Company, 26 Wash. 138, which decision estab-

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0821

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0821

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0821#page/n716/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

duty, mine, decision, statute, costa, ventilation, wash, interpretation, working, washington, statutory, air, coal, supreme, places

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

working places, non delegable, statutory duty, costa decision, coal mine, shafts levels, pacific coast, mine owner, levels stables, delegable duty, positive duty, sixth level, reasonably safe, owner agent, northwestern improvement

Document Status: UGLY