v0829-611

IN THE

TSLnittb BtuttB (Bxtmit (Enttri of Appeal*

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

October Term, 1913.

SHERMAN CLAY & COMPANY, V

A* * II 4 No 2307 -

Appellant,/ . ,,

• • / Appeal from

VS. Order Grant-

( ing Prelimi-

SEARCHLIGHT HORN COMPANY, Wry injunc-

A 11 l tl0n -

Appellee.

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE.

No oral argument was made by the appellant in this

case, and we had no means of knowing what points

would be relied on until we received the subsequently

filed brief on behalf of appellant. That brief is filled

with so many misstatements and false deductions that

we deem it proper to call the court's attention thereto

by a reply brief.

The sole and only assignment of error appearing in

the record, which is at page 59, reads as follows:

"Error of the court in granting the preliminary

injunction."

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0829

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0829

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0829#page/n610/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

horns, patent, assignment, infringing, standard, metal, injunction, horn, searchlight, sales, exhibits, clay, bill, rely, preliminary

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

standard metal, infringing horns, searchlight horn, sherman clay, metal mfg., wholesale department, victor talking, retail department, preliminary injunction., preliminary injunction, pleadings exhibits, patent owner, nielsen patented, metal manufacturing, infringing horns.,

Document Status: UGLY