v0850-659

6

IN THE

United States

Circuit Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Perris Irrigation District,

Plaintiff in Error ;

vs.

Conrad Escher and Louis Rahn,

co-partners doing business as

Escher & Rahn,

Defendants in Error.

BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

We controvert the statement of the case as presented

by the plaintiff in error, as follows:

The complaint was filed December 28, 1905.

We contend that the summons was issued December

28, 1906.

The proceedings thereafter consisted of the follow-

ing:

Summons received by the marshal July 2, 1907;

Summons served July 9, 1907;

Default of defendant for not answering entered Sep-

tember 12, 1907;

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0850

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0850

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0850#page/n658/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

summons, issued, california, default, filing, served, district, process, sheriff, code, section, marshal, civil, statute, courts

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

civil procedure, perris irrigation, irrigation district, revised statutes, pro cedure, southern district, section 911, civil pro, 69 cal., thf datf, stuart 69, statutes provides, served july, sections 405, section 581a

Document Status: UGLY