v0852-573
No. 2353
IN THE
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
For die Ninth Circuit
Charles C. Moore, F. W. Bradley, Maurice
Schweitzer, R. D. Robbins and Walter
- Martin,
Intervenors and Appellants,
vs.
- Donahoo et al.,
Appellees.
REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS.
At the oral argument of this cause two briefs were
filed, one by Messrs. Sullivan, Sullivan and Theodore J.
Roche, in behalf of certain labor claimants, and the
other by Messrs. Goodfellow, Eells & Orrick, in behalf
of certain labor and supply claimants. At that time
permission was granted us by the court to file a reply
to these briefs. This brief is our reply.
Counsel for claimants have taken issue with us di-
rectly upon the three propositions which we laid down
in our opening brief, and they make the following con-
tentions: (1) That the claims represented by them,
which are for supplies and services furnished prior to
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0852
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0852
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0852#page/n572/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
property, income, diversion, payment, trust, mortgagee, receiver, railroad, equity, claims, creditors, corpus, trustee, road, operation
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
justice holmes, current income, railroad property, carnegie steel, union trust, illinois midland, goodfellow eells, eells orrick, continued operation, property itself, operating expenses, net income, labor claims, supplies furnished, sullivan sullivan
Document Status: UGLY