v0910-119

No. 2444.

IN THE

Initrb g^tatrfi (Utrrmt OInurt of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

MAX STEINFELDT,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant in Error,

Reply Brief of Defendant in Error.

JOHN W. PRESTON,

1. 1. Attorney.

WALTER E. HETTMAN,

Asst. U. S. Attorney,

Attorneys for Defendant in Error.

Fil^'l tlii clay of November, 1914.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By . Deputy Clerk.

friT'^

Wnv ^^ 1914

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs910

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs910

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs910#page/n118/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

opium, commerce, power, smoking, congress, importation, government, section, laws, article, federal, customs, ed, regulation, knowing

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

smoking opium, police power, interstate commerce, foreign commerce, unlawful importation, pure food, imported contrary, importation knowing, immigration rules, illegal importation, broken package, transportation concealment, receive conceal, knowingly import, foreign commerce.,

Document Status: UGLY