v0910-153

4

No. 2444

IN THE

United States Qltrruit (finurt nf Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, DISTRICT

OF CALIFORNIA.

MAX STEINFELDT,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant in Error.

Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error

1. 1. EHRLICH.

Attorney for Plaintiff in Error.

Filed thi day of December, A. D., 1914

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By - - - Deputy Clerk.

THK TEN BOSCH COMPANY. tAN FRANOICO

OEC - 3 1914

Fc D. Monckton,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs910

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs910

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs910#page/n152/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

congress, power, revenue, statute, commerce, importation, opium, measure, section, foreign, internal, constitution, clause, argument, tax

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

opium statute, commerce clause, tax imposed, revenue measure, lottery tickets, internal revenue, illegal importation., foreign commerce, unlawful importation, statute involved, revenue statute., revenue measure., receiving goods, plainly adapted, oral argu

Document Status: UGLY