v0942-431

No....{y'.%)..i.Ay^.

IN THE

IIdM Ms Orcoil (oort of Appeals

FOR THE

NINTH CIRCUIT

1. 1. BUCKLER,

Appellant,

vs.

1. 1. BLACK, FRANK L. BELL

and SUNSET COPPER MIN-

ING COMPANY, a Corporation,

Appellees.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.

Upon Appeal From the United States District

Court for the Western District of Wash-

ington, Northern Division.

1. 1. MOORE,

Solicitor and Counsel for Appellant,

501 Peyton Building, Spokane, Washington.

GEORGE H. WALKER,

Solicitor and Counsel for Appellant,

705-6-7 Central Bldg., Seattle, Washington.

COLE PrBtING CtBpAWC *"

. MAY 10 1915

^ F.D. Monckton,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs942

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs942

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs942#page/n430/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

bell, corporation, black, stockholders, copper, sunset, frank, equity, property, receiver, contention, benefit, stock, district, york

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

sunset copper, black frank, frank bell, bell sunset, wash ington, western district, copper mining, language quoted, ington northern, federal practice, corpo ration, cor poration, copper min, walker solicitor, tried below

Document Status: UGLY