v1032-369

No. 2825 ^

IN THE

(Hxtmit (Hmxt cf App^ala

9ar % Nbitf; (Strnitt.

NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

COUNTY OF LINCOLN,

Defendant in Error.

REPLY BRIEF.

Clarence H. Gilbert^

Portland, Oregon,

I ...^ I ^ _^^ ^ GuNN, Rasch & Hall,

I il W %A Helena, Montana,

pr.y o A TO'--* Edmund C. Strode,

' ' ' ^' '^ ^ -' ^ ^ Lincoln, Nebraska,

1. 1. Monckton, ^'^^ Burnett

^ Portland, Oregon,

Cierk^ Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1032

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1032

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1032#page/n368/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, bridge, surety, county, plans, change, bond, congress, war, work, secretary, construction, performance, pier, location

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

center pier, county commissioners, revised codes, portland oregon, navi gable, gable river, cubic yard, contract price, approved march, strode lincoln, session laws, serious loss, salt cement, rasch hall, pro visions

Document Status: UGLY