v1038-159

y

No. 2843

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

MooBE Filter Company (a corporation),

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

1. 1. Taugher^

Defendant in Error.

PETITION FOR A REHEARING ON BEHALF OF

PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

1. 1. Peingle,
2. 1. Shuey,

Merchants Exchange Building, San Francisco,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error

and Petitioner.

File d^h^ ...^...^ ^...day of March, 1917.

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Clerk.

MAR?- 1917

Clerk.

FxBNAir PcBLiaHiNa CouPAirr

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1038

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1038

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1038#page/n158/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, filter, moore, below, summons, quash, patent, right, rendered, presented, services, ground, mining, itself, corporation

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

moore filter, golden cycle, various parts, respectfully submit, moving papers, tonopah belmont, section 411, lawfully exercise, juris diction, specifically reserved, services rendered, san francisco, rendered elsewhere, moore process, mining companies

Document Status: UGLY