v1038-91

^

No. 2843

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Moore Filter Company (a corporation),

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

1. 1. Taugher^

Defendant in Error.

V

BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

1. 1. Pringle,

Clarence A. Shtjey^

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error.

Filed this day of October, 1916.

6 H z^:^

FRANK D. MONCKTON, Cleric.

B eputy Clerk.

Clerk.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1038

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1038

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1038#page/n90/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, services, counter, oliver, contract, moore, expert, confession, taugher, cycle, code, performed, district, damage, california

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

golden cycle, moore filter, merchants heat, defend ant, psychological moment, cycle mining, services performed, cross demand, tonopah belmont, juris diction, heat light, civil procedure, special contract, san francisco, northern district

Document Status: UGLY