v1063-718

No. 2507

IN THE

Htttteib States (Etrnrii GLtmvt nf Appeal*

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

WOO WAI, WONG CHUNG and WONG YEE,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant in Error.

Oral Argument and Reply Brief of

Plaintiffs in Error.

Denis & Loewenthal; C. H. Sooy;

1. 1. Campbell; David L. Levy; and
2. 1. Campbell, Weaver, Shelton & Levy,

Attorneys for Defendants.

Filed this day of March, 1915.

1. 1. MONCKTON, Clerk,

By , Deputy Clerk.

GEO. R. ARMSTRONG, Pri*r -..

7

I vJ IvJ

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1063

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1063

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1063#page/n717/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

government, criminal, wai, woo, crime, officers, chinamen, district, conviction, commit, san, conspiracy, conduct, authority, immigration

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

woo wai, san francisco, professor sanford, wong yee, public policy, government agents, crim inal, chi nese, wong chung, sus pected, oral argument, liquor laws, government officials, government officers, criminal activity

Document Status: UGLY