v1065-419

No. 2503

IN THE

-1

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

1. 1. HAMMOND,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant in Error.

BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

PART TWO

Comprising

QUESTIONS OF LAW FOR DETERMINATION.

Charles S. Wheeler,

1. 1. Burnett,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error.

Filed this day of January, 1916.

^ANK 1^ MONCKTON, Clerk.

^ ^ ^ANK ^

By . :....*....^i....^^.._ Deputy Clerk.

JAN 2 5 19:i6

PEitNAa Publishing Company

1. 1. Monckton,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1065

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1065

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1065#page/n418/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

timber, cut, interest, conversion, damages, measure, government, instruction, innocent, montana, ed, lumber, section, cutting, exception

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

innocent conversion, blackfoot milling, federal courts, allow interest, missoula mercantile, timber growing, dam ages, northern pacific, public domain, defend ant, cut timber, timber cut, timber permit, instruction concerning, innocent trespass

Document Status: UGLY