v1095-700

Document Title Page

NO. 2963.

United States Circuit Court

of Appeal

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a corporation,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

vs.

    1. FARRINGTON, and L. A. HOUCK, co-part-

ners, doing business under the name and style of the

PACIFIC TRANSFER COMPANY, J. DAN-

IELS, H. SANDGATHE, doing business as

SPRINGFIELD GARAGE, V. W. WINCHELL

and F. M. HATHAWAY, co-partners, doing busi-

ness under the name and style of EUGENE FORD

AUTO COMPANY, and A. WILHELM and

JOHN DOE WILHELM, co-partners, doing busi-

ness under the firm name and style of A. WIL-

HELM & SON,

Defendants and Appellees,

ANSWER TO PETITION FOR REHEARING.

LOGAN & SMITH,

Portland, Oregon.

CHARLES A. HARDY, -.

Eugene, Oregon,

Attorneys for Appellees.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1095

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1095

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1095#page/n699/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, contract, citizenship, money, goden, ford, diverse, below, right, issue, motor, rights, controversy, sustained, style

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

ford motor, diverse citizenship, bonus money, eugene ford, busi ness, anti trust, ford auto, diverse citizenship., asserted right, wil helm, stock including, springfield garage, retail price, respectfully submit, pacific transfer

Document Status: UGLY