v1106-411

No. 3007.

IN THE

lntt?5 &M?& (Etrrutt (Eourt of App^ate

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a

Corporation,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

WILLIAM LANGE, JR., and J. U. HASTINGS,

Defendants in Error,

and

WILLIAM LANGE, JR., and J. U. HASTINGS,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a

Corporation,

Defendant in Error.

Reply Brief of Western Union Telegraph

Company, Both on the Principal Ques-

tion and Also on the Claim

for Interest

BEVERLY L. HODGHEAD,

Attorney for Western Union Telegraph Company,

Plaintiff in Error.

ALBERT T. BENEDICT, of New York,

Of Counsel.

The James H. Barry Co., San Francisco.

FILED

my 7 - rat?

1. 1. MONCKTON,

OUERlr

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1106

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1106

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1106#page/n410/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, payment, stock, message, pitt, telegraph, union, right, western, campbell, stipulation, lange, interest, hastings, finding

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

western union, union telegraph, william lange, postal tel., message blank, union tel., mes sages, forfeiture clause, respectfully contend, practically valueless, payment provided, oral contract, non payment, nichols 159, neces sary

Document Status: UGLY