v1131-1093

IN THE . ^

Inttri ^tatFB (dtrrutt (Enurt 0f App^ala

For the Ninth Circuit

Butte & Superior Mining Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Minerals Separation, Ltd., et al.,

Appellees.

y No. 3081

OR.^.:. ARGUMENTS FOR APPELLEES.

Page

ARGUMENT OF HENRY D. WILLIAMS t

ARGUMENT OF WILLIAM HOUSTON KEN YON 22

ARGUMENT OF LINDLEY M. GARRISON 45

Henry D. Williams^

Wm. Houston Kenyon,

Lindley M. Garrison,

Garret W. McEnerney,

Odell W. McConnell,

Counsel for Appellees-

F -^

Pbrnau-Walsh Printing Co.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1131

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1131

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1131#page/n1092/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

oil, process, patent, froth, supreme, mineral, oils, art, ore, claims, fraction, acid, results, particles, air

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

oleic acid, mineral particles, preferential affinity, pine oil, oil coated, coated mineral, air bubbles, soluble frothing, mineral froth, frothing agent, results obtained, ore ., oily liquid, froth forming, art processes

Document Status: UGLY