v1188-384
No. 3230
Qltrnttt (Eamt of Apprafe
- ACKERMAN and MAX BRUMMEL, Individually
and as Copartners Doing Business Under the Firm
Name and Style of ACKERMAN & BRUMMEL, and
ACKERMAN & BRUMMEL, a Copartnership,
Plaintiffs in Error,
vs.
SANTA ROSA-VALLEJO TANNING COMPANY, a Cor-
poration,
Defendant in Error.
WtmBtxvj^ of Swnrh.
Upon Writ of Error to the Southern Division of the
United States District Court of the
Northern District of California,
Second Division.
Filmer Bros. Co. Print, 330 Jackion St., 8. F., Cal.
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1188
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1188
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1188#page/n383/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
leather, vallejo, santa, rosa, ackerman, brummel, backs, contract, tanning, 1916, friedman, sole, hurgren, max, district
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
santa rosa, rosa vallejo, vallejo tanning, ackerman brummel, sole leather, max brummel, leather backs, september 1916, 255 backs, san francisco, northern district, 1916 santa, rosa cal., defend ant, septem ber
Document Status: UGLY