v1188-487

No. 3230

/ ?'

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

1. 1. ACKEEMAN^ et al.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

Santa Eosa Vallejo Tanning Company

(a corporation),

Defendant inE^'ror.

BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

John L. McNaB;,

Byeon Coleman^

Attorneys for Defendant in Error.

f . O. MONC

lEnNin-WALSH Pbintino Oo.

J

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1188

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1188

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1188#page/n486/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, shipment, leather, september, cal, friedman, 1916, payment, vallejo, breach, august, right, wrote, cox, refusal

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

santa rosa, san francisco, ackerman brummel, 54 cal., vallejo tanning, september 25th, rosa vallejo, los angeles, california canneries, august shipment, single authority, september 26th, september 20th, san fran, ohio miss.,

Document Status: UGLY