v1242-177

No. 3412

MnrXth States

flitrrmt OInurt xi Appeals

Mfxt ^n Nttttl? Oltrrmt

1. 1. McGinn,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

OREGON-WASHINGTON RAIL-

ROAD & NAVIGATION COM-

PANY, a corporation.

Defendant in Error.

appig Srfef nf Plaintiff in Srror

1. 1. EDMISTON,

Attorney for Plaintiff in Error,

Spokane, Washington.

SHAW & BORDEN CO. 1IS228

FILE D

i FEB - 9 192

1. 1. MONCKTON,

OUSRK.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1242

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1242

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1242#page/n176/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

system, carrier, taker, care, bill, face, shipment, forth, carmack, amendment, thus, supreme, hours, freight, carriers

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

care taker, pacific system, carmack amendment, union pacific, grand island, spokane washington., prima facie, oregon short, initial carrier, hill system, delivering carrier, washington rail, terminal carrier, road navigation, railway agents

Document Status: UGLY