v1245-1101

No. 3422 I

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Frank H.

SCHU

RMANN,

^

Appellant,

vs.

United States

OF

America

y

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.

1. 1. McBride,

Honolulu, T. H.,

Attorney for Appellant.

1. Joseph Theisen,

San Francisco, California.

Of Counsel.

FILED

APR J 4 1929

1. 1. MONCKTON,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1245

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1245

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1245#page/n1100/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

inference, fraud, presumption, district, allegiance, faith, presumptions, lack, cal, 1904, wrong, inferred, book, 1916, pre

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

infer ence, crime fraud, evi dence, district attor, attor ney, strong clear, pre ponderance, mere conjecture, joseph theisen, itself proves, existing lack, appel lant, 173 cal., 171 cal., yonjjjress rmjst

Document Status: UGLY