v1310-825

Document Title Page

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit.

n

Central California Canneries Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

vs.

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Respondent.

Griffin & Skelley Company, a Corporation,

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

    1. Ainsley Packing Company, a Corporation,

vs.

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

Anderson-Barngrover Manufacturing Company,

a Corporation, Petitioner,

vs.

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Respondent.

Golden Gate Packing Company, a Corporation,

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

  1. F, Pyle & Son, Incorporated, a Corporation,

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

Hunt Brothers Company, a Corporation,

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

I L E

Sunlit Fruit Company, a Corporation,

Dunkley Company, a Corporation,

Petitioner,

K I '

Respondent.

  1. f^ '

PETITIONERS' POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ON MOTIONS AND

PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

THE UNITED STATES IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION, SECOND DIVISION

ORIGINAL BILLS IN THE NATURE OF BILLS OF REVIEW.

Kemper B. Campbell,

William J. Carr,

Frederick S. Lyon,

Francis J. Heney,

Counsel for Petitioners.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1310

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1310

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1310#page/n824/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

dunkley, machine, 1903, 1904, rec, lye, peeling, patent, peaches, witnesses, table, dunkleys, invention, factory, norton

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

san francisco, los angeles, peeling machine, lye tank, dunk ley, corporation petitioner, stewart campbell, peach season, model machine, edwin norton, petitioner respondent., experimental machine, dunkley factory, corporation dunkley, peeling table

Document Status: UGLY