v1311-121

Document Title Page

No. 3824

In The

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

For the Ninth Circuit

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CANNERIES CO., GRIFFIN &

SKELLEY COMPANY, J. C. AINSLEY PACKING

COMPANY, ANDERSON-BARNGROVER MANFG.

CO., J. F. PYLE & SON, INC., HUNT BROTHERS

COMPANY, SUNLIT FRUIT COMPANY,

Appellants,

DUNKLEY COMPxNY (now known as Michigan Canning

& Machinery Company) and DUNKLEY COMPANY,

Appellees.

REPLY BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS - APPELLEES ON

APPEAL AND MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.

FRED L. CHAPPELL,

Kalamazoo, Michigan.

1. RICHARDSON,

San Francisco, Calif.

Counsel for Plaintiffs-

Appellees.

f j ^iwwiJL#

interstau Brief and Keoord Co.. Ltrott. Mlob.

APR 2 8 1922

1. MONCKTON,

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311#page/n120/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

dunkley, michigan, granted, dismiss, appealable, packing, interlocutory, district, vacate, supplemental, sunlit, son, skelley, san, right

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

sunlit fruit, son inc., san francisco, richardson san, pyle son, kalamazoo michigan., hunt brothers, granted leave, francisco calif., chappell kalamazoo, central california, california canneries, barngrover manfg., appel lants, anderson barngrover

Document Status: UGLY