v1311-91

No. 3824

In The

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

For the Ninth Circuit

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CANNERIES CO., GRIFFIN &

SKELLEY COMPANY, J. C. AINSLEY PACKING

COMPANY, ANDERSON-BARNGROVER MANFG.

CO., J. F. PYLE & SON, INC., HUNT BROTHERS

COMPANY, SUNLIT FRUIT COMPANY,

Appellants,

DUNKLEY COMPANY (now known as Michigan Canning

& Machinery Company) and DUNKLEY COMPANY,

Appellees.

REPLY BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES TO DE-

FENDANTS-APPELLANTS' POINTS AND AU-

THORITIES ON PETITION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

AN ORIGINAL BILL IN THE NATURE OF A BILL

OF REVIEW.

FRED L. CHAPPELL,

Kalamazoo, Michigan.

1. 1. RICHARDSON,

San Francisco, Calif.

Counsel for Plaintiffs-

Appellees.

Intttrstai* Briejt mjio i^eoora C.. Detroit. JiJttb.

E D

APR 2

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311#page/n90/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

dunkley, decision, patent, reply, machine, petition, heading, van, fleet, trippett, campbell, table, stewart, 1903, falsus

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

van fleet, dunkley patent, stewart campbell, newspaper article, uno falsus, supports dunkley, testi mony, melville dunkley, pasadena 261, paring table, para graph, lye tank, legally insufficient, heading dunkley, central california

Document Status: UGLY