v1318-589

No. 3896

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Presidio Mining Company (a corporation), Wm.

1. Noyes, B. S. Noyes, L. Osborn, John W. F.

Peat, and L. M. Doherty,

Appellants,

vs.

1. 1. Overton and Carl A. Martin,

Appellees.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS.

1. 1. Dunne,

Of Counsel.

1. 1. Harding,

Henry E. Monroe,

Solicitors for Appellants.

FILED

OCT 1 1922 I

1. 1. MONCKTON,

CLERK.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1318

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1318

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1318#page/n588/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

receiver, receivership, noyes, mining, jurisdiction, presidio, paid, discretion, section, power, property, costs, appointment, complainants, below

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

presidio mining, established procedure, judicial discretion, erroneous exercise, equitable discretion, receiver ship, major features, allowing compensation, minority stockholders, major feature, juris diction, confirming fourth, bonus resolution, sound discretion, san francisco

Document Status: UGLY