v1359-141

No. 4079

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Getz Bros. & Co. or the Orient, Limited,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

1. 1. Shirek, doing business under the

name and style of The Merchandise

Brokerage Company,

Defendant in Error.

BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Warren Gregory,

Allen L. Chickering,

Evan Williams,

Donald Y. Lamont,

SCHIJHL & ScHOENFELD,

Attorneys for Defendant in Error.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1359

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1359

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1359#page/n140/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, office, home, seller, bros, getz, february, clause, cable, shirek, tons, shanghai, document, confirmation, buyers

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

home office, getz bros, getz bros., plate cuttings, home office., shanghai representative, merchandise brokerage, orient ltd., sue buyers, san francisco, parkhurst manager., dear sirs, cuttings stock, 370 tons, wrote getz

Document Status: UGLY