v1397-919

No. 4268

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit / v

Arthur Henry Stetl, Henry Stetl Co., Inc.,

Henry Steil Company, Henry Steil Co.,

and Aethur Henry Steil, doing business

under the names of Henry Steil Co., Inc.,

Henry Steil Company and Henry Steil

Co., and Arthur Henry Steil, John Doe,

Richard Roe, Jane Doe and Minnie Black,

individually and as copartners doing busi-

ness under the firm names and styles of

Henry Steil Co., Inc., Henry Steil Com-

pany and Henry Steil Co.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

Sidney Holland, Percy Holland, Henry G.

Steel, Frank R. Humm, Lionel S. Hol-

land and Hugh D. Holland, copartners

doing business under the firm name and

style of Holland & Sherry,

Defendants in Error.

PETITION FOR A REHEARING ON BEHALF OF

PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.

Robert L. Mc Williams,

Foxcroft Building, San Francisco,

Attorney for Plaintiffs in Error

and Petitioner.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1397

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1397

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1397#page/n918/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

goods, steil, henry, holland, sherry, san, quality, rehearing, inc, francisco, tailors, submit, recalled, petition, merchants

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

henry steil, san francisco, holland sherry, arthur henry, self serving, evi dence, steil john, steel frank, signifi cant, sidney holland, roe jane, richard roe, poor woolens, percy holland, minnie black

Document Status: UGLY