v1533-351

No. 5365

IN THE

^

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

The National City Bank of New York

(a corporation),

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

The Harbin Electric Joint Stock

Company, Ltd.,

Defendant in Error.

BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK,

PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Chalaiee & Franklin,

2 Peking Road, Shanghai, China,

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro,

Standard Oil Building, San Francisco,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error.

Alfred Sutro,

Eugene M. Prince,

standard Oil Building, San Francisco,

Of Counsel.

Pbbnau-Walsh Pblnting Co., San Fsancisco

FILED

MAY 1 9 1928

PAUL P. O'faRIEN,

CLERK

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1533

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1533

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1533#page/n350/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

bank, joint, corporation, engineering, deposit, linden, beardsley, beckman, interest, contract, harbin, china, obligees, deposits, jurisdiction

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

engineering corporation, linden engineering, beckman linden, joint obligees, holding finding, national bank, savings bank, national city, gaston williams, city bank, banking corporation, sui pan, judicial code, joint stock, joint deposit

Document Status: UGLY