v1601-1035
0-f'
No. 5680
IN THE
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
For the Ninth Circuit
-^
Saceamento Subukban Fkuit Lands Com-
pany (a corporation),
Appellant,
vs.
Emily D. Pakkee and Caeeie M. Paekee,
Appellees,
REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT.
Edwaed p. Kelly,
Metropolitan Bank Building, Minneapolis,
BuTLEE, Van Dyke & Desmond,
Capital National Bank Building, Sacramento,
Huston, Huston & Huston,
Woodland,
Attorneys for Appellant.
JUN6-S
Peenatj -WALSH Feinting Co., San Francisco
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1601
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1601
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1601#page/n1034/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
lands, ed, representations, california, parker, land, courts, fruit, contract, braughler, wheat, swenk, oral, huston, objections
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
oral representations, public policy, huston huston, van rensselaer, van dyke, section 1142, rules laid, representations contained, questions propounded, overruling objections, moore 115, lex loci, lex fori, lathrop 165, judicial decisions.
Document Status: UGLY