v1637-939

ifOiJ

IN THE (y

I

ffitnmt Court xf Ki^imU

3xt tt Ntnttf (Etrrutt

1. 1. DOWNING, W. C. GUNTHER,

and E. R. ANDERSON,

Appellants,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT,

1. 1. GUNTHER

COLLIER, COLLIER & BERNARD,

Attorneys for Appellant.

GEORGE NE0NER, United States Attorney,

FRANCIS MARSH, Assistant United States Attorney,

Attorneys for Appellee.

FILED

OCT 1-^?--

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1637

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1637

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1637#page/n938/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

gunther, instruction, unlawful, requested, government, equally, declarations, others, forth, doubt, conspiracy, collier, structions, scheme, request

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

requested instruction, oral argument, italics ours., equally responsible, equally liable., declar ations, collier collier, collier bernard, xf kiimu, witnesses indicate, ury predicated, unquesiionabiy tjie, unlawful scheme, unlawful enter, unlaw ful

Document Status: UGLY