v1656-97

1. 6c-^7

IN THE

^niteb States; Circuit Court

ot ^peali

For the Ninth Circuit

1. 1. HAMMER, a minor, by his Guardian

ad Litem, I. R. Hammer,

Defendant in Error,

vs.

MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY,

a corporation,

Plaintiff in Error.

BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit

WILBUR, BECKETT, HOWELL & OPPENHEIMER,

Board of Trade Building, Portland, Oregon,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error, Montgomery Ward & Co.

COLLIER, COLLIER & BERNARD,

Spalding Building, Oregon,

Attorneys for Defendant in Error.

WEST COAST PRINTING BINDING CO., PORTLAND

i

PAUL P. OB

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1656

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1656

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1656#page/n96/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

liability, employers, work, negligence, risk, danger, ore, common, oregon, care, contributory, structure, pac, instruction, pit

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

employers liability, contributory negligence, express provision, pit rack, involving risk, ployers liability, pit racks, em ployers, work involving, device care, work involved, toledo 77, montgomery ward, double aspect, assumed risk

Document Status: UGLY