v1775-303

No. 7015

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Chapman Dehydrater Company

(a corporation),

Appellant mid Cross- Appellee,

vs.

1. S. Crenshaw, doing business in that name

and also under the fictitious name and style

of California Dehydrating Company,

Appellee and Cross- Appellant.

BRIEF OF APPELLEE AND CROSS=APPELLANT.

Chas. E. Townsend,

Wm. a. Loftus,

Crocker Building, San Francisco,

Attorneys for Appellee

and Cross-Appellant.

A. DoNHAM Owen,

Crockor Building, San Francisco,

Of Counsel.

FILED

MAR 7 - 1933

PAUL P. O'BRIEN.

CLERK

PBBNAn-WALSH I'BINTINO CO., SAN FllANOlSCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1775

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1775

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1775#page/n302/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

air, patent, puccinelli, tunnel, chamber, pearson, dampers, heating, drying, dehydrater, plant, furnace, means, humidity, end

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

german patent, pearson patent, puccinelli patent, heating chamber, furnace chamber, davis farm, tunnel type, partition wall, parallel tunnels, drying tunnel, chapman dehydrater, air circulating, university farm, san francisco, heating means

Document Status: UGLY