v1997-265

No. 8386

In the

United States

Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit. ^

HUGH DAVID EDWARDS, individually and

doing business as Edwards Fruit Company,

Appellant,

vs.

^

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, IN

AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

CENTRAL DIVISION

BRIEF FOR APPELLEE

Peirson M. Hall

United States Attorney

W, Carroll Hunter

Attorney

1. 1. DepartmenUif AgjicidiMre^

Wendell Berge T I L. E D

John S. L. Yost

Special Assistants to the Attorney General

Martin G. White ^ ^AW l3 S37

Solicitor, U. S. Department of Agriculture

Joseph G. Blandi - j, fv^-RicM

Attorney, U. S. Department of Agriculture "^- r w Kf^rii ttM,

Attorneys for Appellee.

tiiUeiiendent-Iteview, Law Priuters, 222 So. Spring St.. Los Angeles. TU 137J

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1997

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1997

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1997#page/n264/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

commerce, section, secretary, provisions, power, interstate, marketing, commodity, oranges, prices, regulation, commodities, period, federal, producers

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

interstate commerce, foreign commerce, purchasing power, section 8c, applicable provisions, federal commerce, declared policy, base period, agricultural commodity, presiding officer, crop adjustment, commerce clause, basic agricultural, allotment plan, commerce power

Document Status: UGLY