v2035-1113

No. 8386

3n t}t Intob g^tata

Oltrrutt Olourt at Appeals

3Far tl? Nintl? (Eirruit. v^

Hugh David Edwards, Individually

and Doing Business as Edwards

Fruit Company,

Appellant,

vs.

United States of America,

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.

1. 1. Knauf,

Harry J. McClean,

Erwin H. Haas and

Henry Wenzlaff,

By Harry J. McClean,

507 Bank of America Bldg., Los Angeles,

Solicitors for Appellant.

FILED

Parker, Stone & Baird Co., Law Printers, Los Angeles. JiW *) : IttOV

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2035

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2035

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2035#page/n1112/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

regulation, power, commerce, oranges, congress, purchasing, producers, legislative, secretary, interstate, coal, argument, production, carter, butler

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

purchasing power, carter coal, foreign commerce, fix prices, statute contravenes, congress decreed, assailed statute, commerce clause, child labor, ap pellee, agricultural adjustment, ad justment, vogt sons, union bridge, specified price

Document Status: UGLY