v2080-5

No. 8245

IN^THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

i-L

City and County of San Francisco (a muni-

cipal corporation), William J. Quinn,

individually and as chief of police of said

city and county, and Matthew Brady, indi-

vidually and as district attorney of said city

and county,

Appellants,

vs.

Market Street Railway Company

(a corporation),

Appellee.

APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF.

John J. O 'Toole,

City Attorney,

of the City and County of San Francisco,

Henry Heidelberg,

Deputy City Attorney,

of the City and County of San Francisco,

City Hall, San Francisco,

Attorney/ s for Appellants,

George Olshausen,

Mills Tower, San Francisco,

Joseph C. Sharp,

Merchants Exchange Building, San Francisco,

Of Counsel.

fi W&mm

r%

'^^' i^

L*V^iiL.

Pebn ATI- Walsh PRiNTtNO Co.,

San Fbancisoo

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2080

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2080

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2080#page/n4/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

ed, ordinance, city, br, safety, findings, argument, arguments, operation, san, opening, 82, master, cars, accidents

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

san francisco, safety devices, rational basis, italics added., ap pellee, legislative choice, highway dept., street railway, sensitive door, reduce accidents, market street, fairly debatable, cross references, argu ments, appel lee

Document Status: UGLY